Here’s some more images of blue stuff to peruse…
CG renders of blue stuff
Lights by Chris in both sRGB and ACEScg primaries. I can see the cyan in the ACEScg, but not really in the sRGB:
Film of blue stuff looking blue
Next we have a bunch of blue stuff, none of which is looking particularly cyan in zCAM to me…
A blue screen:
blue sky:
blue light
Film of blue stuff looking cyan
We do have this picture that looks cyan, again from the gamut mapping group test images:
I find it interesting that while some images like this one are looking cyan in zCAM, many are not.
From a purely pragmatic perspective could we say that “it works” means we can point a camera at a scene and expect to see the colors on screen looking like they did to our eyes? Then the question would be whether the scene looked blue or cyan to the eye? If it looked cyan then we could say zCAM “works” and OpenDRT does not. Conversely if it looked blue then we could say OpenDRT “works” and zCAM does not. The one that is doing the better job at faithfully reproducing the color that the eye saw on set is the one that “works” practically. The file name has “f matas” is that a name or do we know who shot this? I wonder if we could confirm with them how it appeared on set to the eye?