At the risk of repeating myself, I am not adamant on anything. I work for people who are adamant on certain things as you have certainly understood by now. 
I hope that you realize that I am currently in a tricky situation and am a tiny bit desperate for solutions.
I personally feel like that I have done nothing but test ACES upside-down for the past two years (which has been a great experience). Hence my questions, posts and images I provided to this group. Only today I have shared three more images to compare RED IPP2 with the ACES Rec.709 Transform. You should also see the amount of documentation about ACES at work, it’s insane. 
The main issue for 0.1.1 to be discarded was the lack of invertibility, which if I have understood correctly is a requirement for the ACES 2.0 Output Transform. Nonetheless I did some tests with 0.1.1 not more than ten days ago. I was just curious on why some people liked it and others not.
I do understand that changes must be motivated but I think that my examples and explanations from my numerous posts speak for themselves. I have also tried to provide for each render an example of what I think it should look like, as a point of comparison.
I am more than happy to do more testing but I would ask you to point me in the right direction if possible. 
@sdyer I have a question for you : is a production using 0.1.1 Output Transform currently possible ? What would be the cons ? No HDR Output Transform ? No Resolve implementation for DI ?
Thanks guys !
Chris