Thank you to all who participated in the second CLF meeting.
Some outcomes:
-
After much discussion, the option for different number encodings (integer,float) should remain in the specification. [Discussion]
-
The biggest impediment to implementation/adoption of CLF seems to be the complexity in parsing something that can potentially have a huge number of process nodes in arbitrary order and having to run that efficiently on hardware. It requires savvy GPU acceleration and there is hardware in use where that is not easy to do.
-
Re: Process Nodes and complexity vs. convenience: Need to determine the basic alphabet of what’s required to manipulate all anticipated LUTs without adding too much complexity so as to be burdensome to implementors. [Discussion]
-
There could be value to adding a basic log operator in the form of a log with linear form to support the many camera log formats that have a breakpoint between a log and linear segment. [Discussion]
Please continue to discuss these items, but please do so in the relevant discussion threads linked above (or start a new one specific to your question/comment).
The next meeting is planned for Friday, March 8th @9am. Details will be sent out in a new thread for that meeting shortly.